Where to hunt Ruffed Grouse 2026

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Currently, over two dozen states maintain active ruffed grouse hunting seasons. They generally fall into four primary geographic regions:

1. The Great Lakes (The Powerhouses)

This region is widely considered the epicenter of modern ruffed grouse hunting, boasting the highest population densities and millions of acres of public, actively logged forest land.

  • Minnesota: Often ranked as the top state for grouse harvest.

  • Wisconsin: Features massive national and state forests.

  • Michigan: Exceptional hunting, particularly in the Upper Peninsula.

2. The Northeast & New England

Often referred to locally as "partridge," grouse have a deep hunting heritage in the dense, secondary-growth forests here.

  • Maine: Offers sprawling timberlands and massive annual harvests.

  • New Hampshire

  • Vermont

  • New York

  • Massachusetts

  • Connecticut

  • Rhode Island (highly limited populations/seasons)

3. The Appalachian & Mid-Atlantic Mountains

While populations have declined dramatically west of the Appalachians, states with higher-elevation mountain habitats still maintain regulated seasons.

  • Pennsylvania: The state bird; though regulations have been tightened (like cutting late winter seasons) to protect numbers.

  • West Virginia

  • Virginia

  • Kentucky

  • North Carolina: Limited primarily to the western mountain counties.

  • Tennessee

  • Georgia: The absolute southern tip of their eastern range.

  • Ohio (Highly restricted/limited zones)

4. The West & Rockies

Western ruffed grouse are often found in aspen groves, river bottoms, and mixed conifer forests. Because they face less hunting pressure here, they are famously less skittish than their eastern counterparts.

  • Idaho

  • Montana

  • Wyoming

  • Washington

  • Oregon

  • Utah

  • Nevada (Small, introduced populations)

  • California (Limited to the far northwestern coastal timber ranges)

  • Alaska

5. Isolated Pockets

  • North Dakota & South Dakota: Both states have highly localized native populations (such as the Turtle Mountains in ND and the Black Hills in SD) that support small-scale seasons.

⚠️ Important Note on Recent Closures: States like Indiana and Illinois have either completely closed their ruffed grouse seasons or listed the bird as endangered due to severe population crashes. Always double-check the current year's digest for the specific state you plan to hunt, as emergency season shorteners are becoming more common to combat West Nile Virus impacts.

Hiring - REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT COORDINATOR WESTERN GREAT LAKES (MN, IA) Ruffed Grouse Society

RGS & AWS is seeking an outstanding individual to increase member engagement. This position will include organizing fundraising banquets and events, along with engagement and education events for local chapters in your region. The Regional Engagement Coordinator will empower volunteers to become conservation leaders, working with chapters that engage a larger network across the region for conservation delivery, advocacy and fundraising. The Regional Engagement Coordinator will work directly with RGS & AWS volunteers to engage various stakeholders to increase membership and fundraising opportunities at the local, state, and regional levels. Click here for complete job description… 

MN 2026 Ruffed Grouse Counts Down From 2025

 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS


The Minnesota DNR coordinates ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) drumming surveys each
spring with the help of wildlife staff and cooperating federal, tribal, and county biologists. Mean
ruffed grouse drums per stop (dps) were 1.7 statewide (95% confidence interval = 1.5 – 2.0) which is down from last year and consistent with the peak in the population cycle occurring in
2024. This declining pattern was observed in the Northeast, Central Hardwoods, and Southeast survey regions, which comprise the majority of survey routes (124 of 129 routes surveyed this
year). However, in the Northwest, dps increased over the last 2 years. Survey effort has been down in this region the last 2 years due to federal staffing reductions; 5 of 8 routes weresurveyed which may not be representative of the region. The ruffed grouse drumming survey
assumes that only the number of grouse varies among years. The drumming survey is useful for monitoring long-term population trends, but interpretation of a few years of data or less can be tenuous.

Statewide ruffed grouse drums were down from last year and averaged 1.7 dps (95% confidence interval = 1.5 – 2.0 dps; Figure 2). Drum counts were 1.9 (1.6 – 2.2) dps in the Northeast (n = 103 routes), 2.4 (1.2 – 3.5) dps in the Northwest (n = 5), 1.0 (0.5 – 1.5) dps in the
Central Hardwoods (n = 13), and 0.3 (0.1 – 0.6) dps in the Southeast region (n = 8; Figure 3a-d). Thus, in the Northeast, Central Hardwoods, and Southeast regions dps are clearly in the
declining phase of the cycle, whereas in the Northwest, dps have increased the last 2 years.
Survey effort has been down in the Northwest the last 2 seasons due to changes in federal staffing, so only 5 of 8 routes were completed this year. This small sample may not be representative of the region so should be interpreted with caution.

Read the full DNR Report 

ND 2026 Ruffed Grouse Survey / Count

Ruffed grouse survey results indicated an uptick in drums heard in the Turtle Mountains (+40%) and a decrease in the Pembina Hills (-15%) compared to 2025.

“In contiguous forest habitats, ruffed grouse numbers usually rise and fall in cycles, but because habitat in North Dakota is isolated and fragmented, we have not seen these peaks, but the population has been increasing slightly since 2019,” Kolar said. 

Wisconsin Statewide Ruffed Grouse Drumming Activity Decreased 11.6% From 2025

Wisconsin 2026 Statewide Ruffed Grouse Drumming Activity Decreased 11.6% From 2025.


Ruffed Grouse Drumming Survey
2026
 

By Alaina Roth, Taylor Finger, Chris Pollentier, Jes Rees Lohr, and Paul Frater
 

Abstract
 

The 10-year management plan for ruffed grouse prioritized habitat management into three areas in the state. Data from spring drumming surveys was categorized by these new habitat management areas to better reflect habitat and priorities for ruffed grouse management.

 
Statewide ruffed grouse drumming activity decreased 11.6% from 2025 levels based on the roadside survey to monitor breeding grouse activity. The northern foresthhabitat management area had a 10.9% decrease in mean number of drums per stop. The central management area had a 21.8% decrease, and the driftless management areas had a 35.7% decrease in mean number of drums per stop in 2025 compared to the previous year.  

Methods
Statewide
A 10-year management plan for ruffed grouse was developed by the Wisconsin DNR, cooperating agencies, and partner organizations and was accepted by the Natural Resources Board at their 2019 December meeting. The plan is a comprehensive document outlining the objectives for ruffed grouse management in Wisconsin. The plan outlined three priority management areas, which are areas of the state that still have ruffed grouse populations and sections of suitable habitat where enhancing the young forest component could influence grouse populations. These areas have forests as a major component of their landscape with opportunities to promote early successional forest habitat on both public and private land.
 

These areas are the Northern, Central, and Driftless Priority Areas (Figure 1). The southeastern part of the state will no longer be a focus of ruffed grouse management or monitoring and will no longer be surveyed for ruffed grouse using a road-side survey
technique. While scattered populations of grouse do exist in this part of the state, abundance is very low as habitat availability is quite limited; thus, grouse would need to be monitored by another method to be detected.

 
Counts of grouse drumming activity heard along roadsides were conducted on 75 transects throughout these three priority areas in 2026. Sixteen transects in these areas had not detected ruffed grouse for the past three years and were not surveyed in 2026. Transects that do not detect ruffed grouse for three years in a row are placed on a rotation and not surveyed for another three years. A roadside survey for ruffed grouse has been conducted annually since 1964 by DNR wildlife managers, wildlife technicians, foresters, law enforcement personnel, tribal biologists, USFS staff, and Ruffed Grouse Society volunteers to determine grouse population trends throughout Wisconsin. A new 10-stop survey on 117 randomly located transects was initiated in 1994 and continued through 2019. This year marked the seventh year where the southeastern part of the state was not surveyed for ruffed grouse. As per the change-over plan, no "old" drumming routes were run since 1996.  Also, "new" routes which had counts of zero for the first three years were not to be run for three years. After that three-year period, they are to be run again every three years to confirm that they indeed are still zero.

Procedures for the “new” routes were similar to the earlier survey protocols except for one count instead of two and 10 stops instead of 15. All analysis of ruffed grouse drumming data, “old” and “new”, was redone to reflect the changes in surveying strategy and priority areas.

 
Due to this fact some of the data that was published in previous reports will not match with results published here.

 
Research Census Areas

 
Ruffed Grouse drumming data collected on these areas will no longer be collected and/or be a part of the analysis of statewide ruffed grouse abundance data in the state. Any data
collected at these sites will only be used for research purposes.

 
Results

 
Roadside survey responses were received from wildlife managers, wildlife technicians, and other cooperators that helped conduct the survey on 75 transects in 2026. There were 16 transects that were considered zero and not run in 2026. The total number of routes used in estimating a statewide ruffed grouse drumming index in 2026 was 91.
Statewide, ruffed grouse population indices decreased between 2025 and 2026 (Table 1, Figure 2). The Central priority management area had a 21.8% decrease in drumming activity compared to 2025 (Figure 3). The Driftless priority management area had a 35.7% decrease (Figure 4), and the Northern priority management area had a 10.9% decrease (Figure 5) compared to 2025 survey results. Recent research has indicated that 10-year population cycles are less pronounced at the periphery of the ruffed grouse’s range, which we have certainly observed in the driftless area in the last few decades.


Read the Full DNR Post


 















 

Read the original DNR Post